CONTENT

This web site states the following, "For example, a video tape showing the crime being committed." We saw that the web page stated " Does not directly prove guilt but infers guilt by proving evidence of a group of surrounding facts." It also said " On the other hand,. The fact that the jury is to decide upon. In this case, the surveillance footage would be considered indirect or circumstantial evidence, because it does not directly prove that the loiterer attacked the m." The header had circumstantial or indirect evidence as the highest ranking optimized keyword.